On January 2, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) introduced the “Design Patent Bar,” which was an expansion designed to encourage diversity. As USPTO Director Kathi Vidal stated in the months leading up to the new offering, the design patent bar was one of the ways she was working to ensure “everybody […]
The USPTO’s New Design Patent Bar: A Closer Look at the Numbers Read More »
We share a special bond with dogs that has evolved over thousands of years. But it has only been in the last few years, particularly since the pandemic, since these loyal canine companions have evolved from being more than just house pets. Our hounds have nudged, wagged, sniffed, snuggled, and loved their way into our
Paws For Celebration: How Furry Coworkers Changed Office Life Forever Read More »
Lawyers love to talk about their client success stories and latest wins, particularly on websites, blogs, LinkedIn and other social media. This form of lawyer self-promotion is particularly pronounced in litigation matters, where the victorious lawyers and their firms routinely, and proudly, announce to the world what wonderful result they achieved for their client. Many
Lawyer Bloggers Beware: “Public” Client Information Is Still Confidential Read More »
The USPTO has once again disclosed confidential information of applicants—this time for patent applicants. Previously, the USPTO has disclosed confidential information of trademark applicants, including a breach of home addresses. However, many practitioners have wondered—what are their obligations with respect to the USPTO’s actions. Duty to Communicate with Clients When the USPTO breaches its duty
The USPTO’s Breach of Trust: Practitioner Response and Reporting Requirements Read More »
The USPTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) handles investigations and disciplinary proceedings against attorneys and other practitioners who engage in misconduct before the USPTO. Navigating these complex proceedings without legal representation can be a daunting and perilous task. We have covered previously various best practices regarding what to do if you find yourself with
Pro Se Representation Before the USPTO OED: A Risky Gamble Read More »
This week marks five years since the USPTO implemented its Requirement of U.S. Licensed Attorney for Trademark Applicants and Registrants. Also known as the “U.S. Counsel Rule”, the USPTO on August 2, 2019 amended its trademark rules of practice to require any non-U.S. domiciled trademark applicant, registrant, or party to a USPTO trademark proceeding to
37 CFR 11.801 is a regulation that imposes a duty on practitioners to cooperate with the Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED). The regulation is divided into two key provisions that apply to applicants for registration, and those under disciplinary/reinstatement investigation: False Statements: The regulation first proscribes making false statements of material fact. This is
Understanding 37 CFR 11.801: A Lesson in Not Fully Cooperating with OED Read More »
The world of intellectual property law is buzzing with questions and commentary regarding the practicality and ethics of using artificial intelligence to aid the practice of law before the USPTO. As I addressed in a prior blog post, some of the concerns are much ado about nothing. However, one question previously left unanswered was the
AI and Patent Law: Can Machines Uphold the Duty of Disclosure under 37 CFR 1.56? Read More »
