When ChatGPT went live in late 2022, lawyers were some of the first to buy into its potential. Don’t like to do research? No prob; AI has you covered. Not the best writer on the block? No sweat, let AI craft your winning brief. Some lawyers were led to believe it would be stupid NOT […]
Are You High or Just Hallucinating? AI Gets Lawyers in Trouble Read More »
Earlier this year, in Dino Danelli and Edward Brigati v. Beata Music LLC, Opposition No. 91249965 (March 29, 2024) (not precedential), the Board issued a 55-page opinion sustaining an opposition to the registration of a mark. Briefly, the parties we involved in a civil action with respect to a mark: “The Rascals.” After a number
Did Those Young Rascals Use AI Before the USPTO? Read More »
The world of intellectual property law is buzzing with questions and commentary regarding the practicality and ethics of using artificial intelligence to aid the practice of law before the USPTO. As I addressed in a prior blog post, some of the concerns are much ado about nothing. However, one question previously left unanswered was the
AI and Patent Law: Can Machines Uphold the Duty of Disclosure under 37 CFR 1.56? Read More »
In the past year, I have seen an increase in questions related to artificial intelligence. Specifically, patent and trademark lawyers have asked whether it is permissible for those lawyers engaged in practice before the USPTO to use Generative AI. While I have and continue to present on this topic multiple times, including (here), (here), and
An IP Lawyer’s Guide to Artificial Intelligence Read More »
Lately I have been inundated with news and information about Artificial Intelligence. It seems that all the legal news is talking about these days, and will not stop talking about, is how AI is going to change my life. Forever. In major ways. As the ABA recently noted, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing everything everywhere
Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers: How To Maintain Your Technical Competency Read More »
