Trademark ethics

Three Lessons from the USPTO’s Recent Disciplinary Decisions Regarding Working with Foreign Trademark Associates

From our previous posts, it is clear that, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has been increasing investigations and disciplinary actions against those who work with foreign trademark associates.  However, in today’s global economy, many clients demand global trademark and patent protection—so is it unethical for a U.S. Trademark Attorney to work with […]

Three Lessons from the USPTO’s Recent Disciplinary Decisions Regarding Working with Foreign Trademark Associates Read More »

The “U.S. Counsel Rule” Turns Five: Best Practices For Trademark Attorneys To Avoid USPTO Discipline

This week marks five years since the USPTO implemented its Requirement of U.S. Licensed Attorney for Trademark Applicants and Registrants.  Also known as the “U.S. Counsel Rule”,  the USPTO on August 2, 2019 amended its trademark rules of practice to require any non-U.S. domiciled trademark applicant, registrant, or party to a USPTO trademark proceeding to

The “U.S. Counsel Rule” Turns Five: Best Practices For Trademark Attorneys To Avoid USPTO Discipline Read More »

Federal Circuit Issues Opinion Reversing USPTO’s Improper Invalidation of Trademark

On October 18, 2023, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in GREAT CONCEPTS, LLC, v. CHUTTER, INC., reversing the decision of the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.  The Court analyzed very crucial point in the progeny of In re Bose— whether alleged fraud on the USPTO that could invalidate a trademark application also applies

Federal Circuit Issues Opinion Reversing USPTO’s Improper Invalidation of Trademark Read More »

Trademark Alert

USPTO Announces Requirement for Support Staff to Obtain Identity Verification

On September 5, 2023, the USPTO announced in a Federal Register Notice that all non-attorney support staff would be required, beginning on January 20, 2024, to verify their identity to access the USPTO’s Trademark Electronic Application System (“TEAS”).  This follows multiple changes in July 2022 and October 2023 to the USPTO’s Trademark Verified USPTO.gov Account

USPTO Announces Requirement for Support Staff to Obtain Identity Verification Read More »

Lawyers Who “Dabble” In USPTO Trademark Matters Face Nightmare Of OED Ethics Investigations, Discipline

“A man’s got to know his limitations”  – Clint Eastwood, Magnum Force  (1973) The USPTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline has become increasingly active in the last several years, particularly in investigating business or general practice attorneys who dabble in trademark law.  Many have learned the hard way–through an ethics inquiry and possible disciplinary decisions–regarding

Lawyers Who “Dabble” In USPTO Trademark Matters Face Nightmare Of OED Ethics Investigations, Discipline Read More »

Trademark Ethics: 5 Things That Might Keep You Up At Night

Emil Ali has been keeping very busy representing trademark practitioners in USPTO ethics investigations and disciplinary proceedings.  Next Thursday, May 12, Emil will be sharing his insights into the perilous ethical landscape faced by trademark counsel, in a live online webinar.  Every trademark practitioner should watch and learn from the mistakes others have made!  This

Trademark Ethics: 5 Things That Might Keep You Up At Night Read More »

Tightrope

Working with Chinese Trademark Agencies – A Dangerous Game, or Delicate Tightrope?

Following a recent report issued by the Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General, as well as a plethora of recent disciplinary actions published by the USPTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline, many practitioners have done a retrospective analysis of their trademark practices with clients and agencies in China.  But is it time to give

Working with Chinese Trademark Agencies – A Dangerous Game, or Delicate Tightrope? Read More »

USPTO Responds to OIG Report – Continues to Blame Attorneys and Foreign Agents

Last week, we provided commentary regarding a scathing report issued by the Inspector General of the Department of Commerce (“OIG”).  Since that time, the USPTO published a blog post, penned by Drew Hirshfeld, performing the functions and duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, and David Gooder, Commissioner for Trademarks. 

USPTO Responds to OIG Report – Continues to Blame Attorneys and Foreign Agents Read More »

Scroll to Top